Our submission to the Spending Review 2025, phase 2

Date published: 05 January 2025
Secondary school girl in design and technology lesson

Introduction

Submitted to: HM Treasury

Our submission to the Spending Review Phase 2, setting out our policy proposals. They draw on our extensive research and first-hand experience of working with STEM educators and employers. The recommendations are aimed predominantly for HM Treasury and the Department for Education.

Who this is for

  • MPs 
  • Policymakers

 

Key recommendations

EngineeringUK’s spending priorities for STEM and engineering education and skills are sub-divided into 6 broad categories:

  1. Growing engineering apprenticeships for young people 
  2. Ensuring high-quality careers provision and work experience in schools
  3. Supporting effective STEM outreach programmes
  4. Improving STEM teacher recruitment, training, and retention
  5. Reforming the national curriculum
  6. Expanding routes into engineering higher education

Within these, we make the following costed policy proposals:

  • Move towards a new model of directly funding apprenticeships for young people between the ages of 16 and 18, by re-directing unallocated apprenticeship levy funding
  • Publish a new long-term careers strategy, backed by at least £85m per annum in funding over the next five years, alongside a comprehensive work experience strategy as a roadmap to delivering 2 weeks’ work experience for every pupil
  • Fund what works research to conduct robust evaluations of STEM interventions
  • Commit to sustaining funding for the STEM Ambassadors programme, delivered via STEM Learning
  • Additional funding for the British Science Association to double the uptake of CREST Awards over the next 5 years, whilst maintaining current funding
  • Sustain existing Initial Teacher Training funding for STEM subjects, including key practical subjects such as Design & Technology.
  • Invest in high-quality Continuing Professional Development for STEM teachers
  • Sufficient funding to implement the changes recommended by the Curriculum and Assessment Review
  • Increase grant funding for strategically important, high delivery-cost STEM courses via the Strategic Priorities Grant