Introduction
This submission to the Department for Education (DfE) welcomes aspects of their proposed reforms to post-16 qualifications in England. DfE’s proposals include the introduction of V Levels and two new pathways at Level 2.
EngineeringUK worked with the National Engineering Policy Centre (NEPC) on this response. EngineeringUK believes that some simplification and greater consistency in post-16 vocational qualifications could help ensure that they are well recognised. However, variety in qualifications’ size and content can be important to meet learners’ and employers’ needs.
We highlight some risks that DfE must manage to ensure that new qualifications lead to positive change, building on the strengths of the existing system. DfE’s proposals introduce significant changes. A careful approach, including continued consultation, is needed to guard against unintended consequences.
Who this is for
- MPs
- Policymakers
- Employers
- PEIs
Key findings
- DfE should carefully map how existing qualifications will be replaced to avoid losing entry points into technician pathways
- Competence in mathematics is essential for many engineering occupations. DfE must carefully consider how learners on vocational engineering and technology pathways can develop mathematical skills
- There must be clear differentiation between V Levels and T Levels
- DfE should consider exactly how progression into employment or further education will work. This should include considering how Level 2 pathways and V Levels fit with apprenticeship standards at appropriate levels
- There are potential unintended consequences of the changes, such as impacts on education providers and on adult learners
- Excellent and impartial information, advice, and guidance will be needed to ensure that young people, parents and teachers understand the new offer. This must be treated as a core entitlement, not an optional extra
